

USAID closure will hurt Florida – and America
"Your Turn"
Michael Boorstein
Guest Columnist
Sarasota Herald-Tribune
Published: July 8, 2025
On July 1, the White House announced the closure of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Created by Congress in 1961 under President John F. Kennedy, USAID had long served as a key pillar of American diplomacy and soft power. Its dissolution – which was not formally approved by Congress – barely registered with most Americans. But for those of us who spent our lives representing the United States abroad, it was a devastating day.
I served for 35 years as a foreign service officer, with postings across the globe. One of them was in Kinshasa -- the capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo -- where USAID quietly helped transform communities. It partnered with local organizations to train election monitors, educate voters, and support democratic movements. These efforts weren’t imposed from Washington; rather they were locally driven and backed by American partnership. They also served U.S. interests: promoting democratic governance abroad reduces conflict, fosters stability and builds trust. These efforts made Americans safer – and our nation more respected.
Our daughter, raised overseas, worked at USAID in Washington, supporting missions in Europe and Eurasia, including Ukraine. She, like thousands of American professionals, contractors, and local staff, lost a job she loved. Her personal loss is part of a broader national setback—one that undermines our security, economy and global leadership.
USAID was never a charity; it was a strategic tool off U.S. foreign policy. As diplomats, we advanced American ideals, and USAID provided the resources and expertise to make these ideals real through grants, training, and technical support.
It partnered hundreds of nonprofit organizations, including many faith-based groups. It earned trust, open doors and built lasting goodwill.
By 2023, USAID had become one of the world’s largest aid organizations, operating in over 100 countries. It addressed urgent global challenges: HIV/AIDS, food insecurity, education, agriculture, disaster response and democratic reform. . Its $40 billion annual budget represented less than 1% of the federal budget, (costing the American about 18 cents per day according to UCLA researchers).
The consequences of its closure are already being felt. Food insecurity is rising. Maternal and child health systems are collapsing. Emergency responses in war zones – from Ukraine and Sudan to Gaza and Syria – are faltering.
And while the United States retreats, others – particularly China—are stepping in to fill the void.
Since USAID began winding down earlier this year, an estimated 308,000 people have died -- 208,000 of them children. According to The Lancet, over the next five years 14 million deaths could occur due to lost services, including 4.5 million children under age 5.
Health care disruptions alone may lead to 2.4 million preventable deaths annually.
Critics claim USAID was bloated or ideologically biased. For example, U.S. Rep. Greg Steube, of Sarasota, supported the abolition of the USAID: he said the agency was out of step with an “America First” agenda. That view hurts America – and Florida.
For more than six decades, USAID had bipartisan support. Democratic and Republican presidents alike recognized that foreign assistance advanced both American values and national interests.
Its closure isn’t just a foreign policy misstep; it’s an economic blow to our state. Florida stands to lose thousands of jobs, millions of dollars in agricultural contracts, and vital nonprofit partnerships linked to international development. These impacts are already rippling through communities tied to research, education and innovation.
As someone who spent a career strengthening America’s global reputation, I fear the damage we have done by walking away. We’ve opened the door to instability, migration, disease, and extremism – threats that don’t stay overseas.
USAID was an investment in a safer world, and one far cheaper that military engagement. Abandoning it signals a retreat from American leadership and moral authority.
It tells the world that we no longer show up—until it’s too late.
Sarasota may feel far from the front lines of global diplomacy, but we are not immune to its consequences. And we are not powerless. Let us raise our voices. Let’s remind our elected leaders that this matters – not just for the world but for us as well.
It's time to restore one of the most effective, low-cost tools we have ever had to build healthier, more secure and more humane world.
Michael Boorstein was a career foreign service officer for 35 years, serving at seven posts overseas in Europe, Africa, East Asia and Latin America. He is the vice president of the Sarasota Institute of Lifelong Learning. He resides in Longboat Key.
Overview of US Foreign Aid in 2022
Before Trump 2.0

This recent map shows U.S. foreign aid distribution by country (in inflation-adjusted dollars) for fiscal year 2023. Darker shades indicate higher aid levels—Ukraine, Israel, Ethiopia, and others in sub-Saharan Africa received the most (usafacts.org).
Why US Foreign Aid Matters
The map highlights how U.S. foreign aid under President Biden reflects strategic priorities—from bolstering Ukraine against Russian aggression, to supporting longstanding allies like Israel, and investing in global development and humanitarian causes across Africa and the Middle East.
Key insights from U.S. aid distribution under President Biden
-
Total annual foreign aid: In fiscal 2023, the U.S. disbursed approximately $71.9 billion in foreign aid—about 1.2% of total federal outlays (pewresearch.org) with 36% representing humanitarian relief and critical health programs.
-
Largest recipients:
-
Ukraine: Received $16.6 billion (≈23% of total); the top recipient thanks to the Russia–Ukraine war (usafacts.org).
-
Israel: About $3.3 billion, mostly in military aid (pewresearch.org).
-
Other substantial recipients include Ethiopia ($1.8 billion), Jordan, Afghanistan, Somalia, DR Congo, Syria, Nigeria, Yemen (each over $800 million) (en.wikipedia.org).
-
-
USAID’s role: USAID managed roughly $43.8 billion—three-fifths of total assistance—and granted to over 100 countries (en.wikipedia.org). In 2022–23, one‐third of its funding supported Ukraine.
-
Aid categories in FY 2023:
-
Macroeconomic support (e.g., direct budgetary aid): $16 billion (22%) – largely Ukraine (pewresearch.org).
-
Humanitarian relief: $15.6 billion (22%) (pewresearch.org).
-
Health (HIV, TB, AIDS): $10.6 billion (15%).
-
Military assistance: Officially $8.2 billion (11%), but much larger when including arms sales via Foreign Military Sales programs (pewresearch.org).
-
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been officially shut down. The State Department has taken over USAID's foreign aid programs and is now administering them. This move marks the end of USAID as an independent agency and the transfer of its functions to the State Department.
The decision to close USAID was part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to restructure and re-evaluate U.S. foreign assistance programs. This included concerns about efficiency, accountability, and alignment with national interests
.
The closure has been met with criticism from some quarters, with concerns raised about the potential impact on global development and humanitarian efforts. Former Presidents Obama and Bush labelled the closures a “colossal mistake” and both warned of the deadly consequences of the loss of USAID’s life-saving interventions
However, the State Department has indicated that it intends to continue many of the programs previously managed by USAID, but under a new framework.
